Researcher in International Relations and Foreign Policy
The study examines the concepts of "privatization of wars" and "crisis manufacturing" to analyze transformations such as international conflicts and the roles of global and regional actors in pursuing geopolitical objectives. It uses Sudan as a contemporary case study.
Current events in Sudan serve as a practical illustration of the study's themes. The impact of these phenomena on stability, peace, and security in Sudan and the surrounding region highlights the complexity of interactions between internal and external players. Some analysts characterize this overlap as a colonial approach, employing modified notions of human rights and democracy. This interaction typically involves intertwined interests that influence international relations, the balance of power, and the foreign policies of nations.
The study seeks to understand how the privatization of wars and crisis manufacturing has contributed to the internationalization and complexity of conflicts within Sudan. It also explores how these phenomena have affected Sudan's foreign policy and internal stability.
In analyzing and discussing the problem, the study employed a historical approach to trace the roots of the phenomena, a descriptive approach to identify their manifestations, and an analytical approach to explain their effects. Additionally, it utilized a legal framework to understand the legislative aspects related to the privatization of wars, along with previous studies as supporting tools.
The study concludes that the privatization of wars in Sudan has facilitated foreign interventions, paving the way for regional and international powers to become involved in the Sudanese disputes. These interventions have exacerbated the crisis, strained Sudan's foreign relations, and undermined internal stability and security.
Keywords: Keywords: Privatization of wars, crisis manufacturing, private sector, multiple interests, militias, escalation of conflicts, Sudan, Sudanese crisis, foreign interventions.
